THE VERTICAL EXPANSION OF NATO'S ROLE THROUGH STRATEGIC DOCUMENTS
Keywords:
NATO, identity, transformation, elementsAbstract
During its 76 years of existence, NATO has gone through a specific evolutionary process. From an alliance for collective defense during the Cold War, to an alliance without a clear threat after the Cold War, NATO expanded its area of action with the defense and protection of the shared values of the peoples of the North Atlantic region, based on the principles of democracy, individual freedoms, and the rule of law. Following Russia’s aggressive war in Ukraine, NATO has once again refocused on its core mission of deterrence and defense.
This paper focuses on explaining the process of transformation of NATO’s identity and the elements characterizing NATO’s contemporary identity. A qualitative and historical-interpretative method is used to trace the main processes in order to analyze the main research problem: the transformation of NATO’s identity from a traditional collective security organization during the Cold War into a broader security community after 1991. NATO, as a case study, is analyzed across multiple historical periods.
The fundamental assumption is that NATO transformed its identity through activities aimed at defining its role and activities aimed at maintaining that role, in order to avoid discreditation.
References
Adler, E. (2008). The spread of security communities: Communities of practice, self-restraint, and NATO’s post-Cold War transformation. European Journal of International Relations, 14(2), 195–230.
Adler, E., & Barnett, M. (1998). A framework for the study of security communities. In E. Adler & M. Barnett (Eds.), Security communities (pp. 29–65). Cambridge University Press.
Asmus, R. D., Kugler, R. L., & Larrabee, F. S. (1993). Building a new NATO. Foreign Affairs, 72(4), 28–40.
Baranovskyi, F., Kamionka, M., & Melnyk, H. (2024). Polish military diplomacy concerning Ukraine in 2022–2024: Between centrism and peripherality of direction. Balkan Social Science Review, 24, 281–299.
Ciuta, F. (2002). The end(s) of NATO: Security, strategic action and narrative transformation. Contemporary Security Policy, 23(1), 35–62.
Collins, B. J. (2011). NATO: A guide to the issues. Praeger.
Dinev, I. I. (2011). Transforming NATO: New allies, missions and capabilities. Lexington Books.
Flockhart, T. (2011). NATO and the (re)constitution of roles: “Self,” “we,” and “other”? In S. Harnisch, C. Frank, & H. W. Maull (Eds.), Role theory in international relations: Approaches and analyses (pp. 181–202). Routledge.
Gheciu, A. (2005). NATO in the "New Europe": The politics of international socialization after the Cold War. Stanford University Press.
Jackson, P. T. (2003). Defending the West: Occidentalism and the formation of NATO. The Journal of Political Philosophy, 11(3), 223–252.
Kitchen, V. M. (2009). Argument and identity change in the Atlantic security community. Security Dialogue, 40(1), 95–114.
Mearsheimer, J. J. (1990). Why we will soon miss the Cold War. The Atlantic Monthly, 266(2), 35–50. https://www.mearsheimer.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/A0014.pdf
Mearsheimer, J. J. (2001). The tragedy of great power politics. W. W. Norton.
Moore, R. R. (2007). NATO’s new mission: Projecting stability in a post–Cold War world. Praeger Security International.
NATO. (1949, April 4). The North Atlantic Treaty. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_17120.htm
NATO. (1991, November 7–8). The Alliance's new strategic concept. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_23847.htm
NATO. (1997, July 8). Madrid Declaration on Euro-Atlantic Security and Cooperation. https://www.nato.int/docu/pr/1997/p97-081e.htm
NATO. (1999, April 23–24). The Alliance’s strategic concept. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_27433.htm
NATO. (2010, November 19–20). Active engagement, modern defence: Strategic concept for the defence and security of the members of the North Atlantic Treaty Organisation. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_68580.htm
NATO. (2014, May 14). NATO’s partnership policy in a changing security environment [Speech by NATO Deputy Secretary General Alexander Vershbow]. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_109244.htm
NATO. (2022, June 29). NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. https://www.nato.int/nato_static_fl2014/assets/pdf/2022/6/pdf/290622-strategic-concept.pdf
NATO. (2023, July 11). Vilnius Summit communiqué. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_217320.htm
NATO. (2024, July 10). Washington Summit Declaration. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/official_texts_227678.htm
Panel discussion with NATO Secretary General Anders Fogh Rasmussen and former NATO Secretaries General Lord Robertson and Jaap de Hoop Scheffer. (2014, March 21). Brussels Forum. https://www.nato.int/cps/en/natohq/opinions_108553.htm
Seroka, J. (2007). Security considerations in the Western Balkans: NATO’s evolution and expansion. East European Quarterly, 41(1), 1–24.
The Washington Post. (2024, March 11). NATO members must raise their defense spending to 3 percent of GDP. [Op-ed by Andrzej Duda]. https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2024/03/11/polish-president-duda-strengthen-nato/
Walt, S. M. (1997). Why alliances endure or collapse. Survival: Global Politics and Strategy, 39(1), 156–179.
Walt, S. M. (2005). The taming of American power: The global response to U.S. primacy. W. W. Norton.
Webber, M., Sperling, J., & Smith, M. A. (2012). NATO’s post–Cold War trajectory: Decline or regeneration? Palgrave Macmillan.
Williams, M. C., & Neumann, I. B. (2000). From alliance to security community: NATO, Russia and the power of identity. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 29(2), 357–387.
Wolff, A. T. (2009). The structural and political crisis of NATO transformation. Journal of Transatlantic Studies, 7(4), 385–405.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Assoc. Prof. Dr. Anita Gligorova, Assoc. Prof. Dr. Jasmina Trajkoska Naumoska, Asst. Prof. Dr. Qazime Sherifi
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (CC BY 4.0).
